Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Can Monkeys Teach Us About Fairness? Sat May 17, 2025 17:00 | Noah Carl A famous study from 2003 was touted as showing that monkeys reject "unequal pay". However, a more recent shows that the original interpretation was wrong. So, no, monkeys don?t have much to teach us about fairness.
The post Can Monkeys Teach Us About Fairness? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Falklands War Landing Craft is Decorated for Pride Sat May 17, 2025 15:00 | Will Jones The decoration of a Falklands War landing craft in rainbow colours to celebrate Pride has caused uproar among veterans, who called it "entirely inappropriate" and said, "Our Falklands dead will be turning in their graves."
The post Falklands War Landing Craft is Decorated for Pride appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Worldwide Embalmer Survey Reveals Striking Rise in White Fibrous Clots Following COVID-19 Vaccinatio... Sat May 17, 2025 13:00 | Will Jones The latest Worldwide Embalmer White Fibrous Clot Survey ? a multi-year investigation into the sudden and widespread appearance of anomalous clots in the deceased ? has revealed a striking rise since COVID-19 vaccination.
The post Worldwide Embalmer Survey Reveals Striking Rise in White Fibrous Clots Following COVID-19 Vaccination appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
UK Puts Chagos Islands Deal on Hold to Avoid ?Toxic Backlash? Sat May 17, 2025 11:00 | Will Jones Downing Street has delayed plans to hand over the Chagos Island to Mauritius, amid fears of a "toxic backlash" from Labour MPs over the cost of the multi-billion pound settlement.
The post UK Puts Chagos Islands Deal on Hold to Avoid “Toxic Backlash” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Why We Politicise Science Sat May 17, 2025 09:19 | James Alexander Modern politicians lack the personal authority of ancient kings and so they appeal to The Science to impose their schemes on the population. This is how science becomes corrupted by politics, says Prof James Alexander.
The post Why We Politicise Science appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Another repression of the animal liberation movement?
international |
animal rights |
opinion/analysis
Sunday October 24, 2010 00:33 by Mi cke y - !Liberate!

At the end of August Time.com published an article containing a controversial opinion of co-founder of the most popular organization fighting (supposedly) for animal rights – Ingrid Newkirk. Mrs President, said, inter alia, that “Absolute purists should be living in a cave.” In the ranks of the activists PETA has been regarded as the organization which in no way improve the lot of animals. After another raid someone may even be tempted to declare that the organization becomes harmful, because denying ethical considerations justifies the same industry which is responsible for the holocaust of the animals. This in turn leads to the construction of the belief that everything is really okay, we should eat animals, we just need to kill them a bit more gently. This way, Burger King customers will soon become defenders of the animals. Anyway Gary L. Francione issued an excellent response to Mrs. Newkirk views. I urge you to read it to understand fully what I mean. On the one hand, we have an apparent desire to make changes represented by the creators of popular NGOs and on the second hand we observe reinforcing the repression against those who try to make real changes. This is particularly evident in the United States, where not so long ago, Walter Bond was arrested, accused of carrying out direct action under the Animal Liberation Front. By the way as it turned out that FBI informant, who delivered information about Walter Bond, was his brother. Shortly after the FBI raid took place at the house of well-known activist Peter Young, who runs a website dedicated to animal rights Voice of the Voiceless. And from other reports, we can learn about the secret meeting of the companies involved in violence against animals, which is to be devoted to “extremists fighting for animal rights.” To make matters worse a few days ago it emerged that Monsanto hired a Blackwater, which is responsible among others for the crimes committed in Iraq, to spying on the eco and animal rights movements. The measures taken by businesses are becoming more repressive, which may indicate a growing fear of the consequences of activists actions. Especially, thanks to publicity they gain, animal rights issues get to the commercial media, hitting the mass audience. And this is a problem for companies that are part of the industry exploiting animals. They are happy to condone the existence of such organizations as conformist PETA , but do everything they can to harm those who strive for true liberation of animals. These companies are very afraid that their customers can see the truth about the production of food, clothing or other products of animal origin. Less consumption means lower profits. And thanks to the support of the state officials they criminalize those who fight for a right cause, accusing them of absurd allegations (eg, terrorism), at same time pursuing the policy of absolute cruelty to other beings.
Increased repression is often a symbol of the growing strength of the movement. Similar mechanisms can be found in history or even in modern times (the Zapatistas, Greek anarchists). Capitalist thinking instilled to managers and employees of big business is not able to understand a completely different thought, based on ethics, not a selfish point of view. This does not mean, however, that this thought may be stifled by intimidation or pressure from the state forces. The more repression, the more resistance. The more terror, the greater will to act. This in turn may result in increasing the strength and commitment of the people in the struggle for animal liberation. In the broad outline, also in a political struggle, which I personally link to the animals issues as the whole movement must become a part of it. Social revolution (in which the animal rights are the key issue) instead of ineffective reforms or welfare can ensure the animals freedom and respect.
Sources:
http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/media/links/p3443/a...n.pdf
http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/ingrid-newkirk-on-p...iple/
http://www.voiceofthevoiceless.org/alf-lone-wolf-arrest...torm/
http://www.voiceofthevoiceless.org/breaking-fbi-raids-u...time/
http://www.voiceofthevoiceless.org/leaked-document-reve...reat/
http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=201009182110...05427
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (2 of 2)
Jump To Comment: 1 2You know perfectly well that people don't go from a condition of little or no awareness directly to radical / revolutionary
PETA, by playing the corporations own media and celebrity games, are achieving awareness of animal issues on a large scale. Because of this, they are considered a much bigger threat than ALF to the status quo. That is why they are targetted
That is why vested interests would like nothing more than for PETA to be rejected by other animal rights groups. Divide and conquer is the game of the corporations. Don't fall for it. Many of those people who PETA gets through to will go on to a deeper awareness.
There is no reason why all groups can't proceed on all levels in parallel. There is no reason why different approaches can't be tried. Not everyone is amenable to a radical or revolutionary approach. In fact very few are. Largely because of the very tools used successfully by corporate interests. Tools that PETA is now using against them, and quite successfully.
No, Not everyone is amenable to to radical or revolutionary change. (The small number that are can be easily smeared and neutralised.) It's naive to think they are.
Or perhaps it's not so naive? Perhaps it's something else at work here?
I think most of your comments is correct. Only one thing. It depends on what you define as a revolutionary change. Contemporary revolutionary thought puts a large extent on education, not a sudden change, which could lead to disaster. Only conscious society can accept radical changes.
The thing with PETA is, that yes, they managed to attract the attention of people using photos with naked chicks or Pamela Anderson involvment in their campaigns but at the end of day it didn't give expected effects. The welfare reforms have failed. Also you can't be against torture, while accepting a lighter form of torture. As Francione's said:
"The reforms that are promoted by PETA and the other new welfarist groups for the most part do not provide significant welfare benefits for animals. They just represent a different form of torture. Waterboarding someone on a bare board and waterboarding them on a padded board is still waterboarding. "
However, of course, I agree with you, there should be different methods of struggle against the exploitation of animals, not just direct action.