A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by
The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
The Return of the ?Boiler Tax? Mon May 19, 2025 19:16 | Will Jones
Households are facing the threat of a?new ?40 'boiler tax'?as Labour consults on plans to raise heat pump targets despite waning demand. "It?s like fining the local butcher because people aren?t eating enough greens."
The post The Return of the ‘Boiler Tax’ appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Top Doctors Say it is ?Inconceivable? that Biden?s Cancer Diagnosis Wasn?t Caught Sooner Mon May 19, 2025 17:06 | Will Jones
Medical experts have declared it "inconceivable" that former President Joe Biden's "aggressive" form of prostate cancer was not caught earlier by doctors, raising questions about a cover-up.
The post Top Doctors Say it is “Inconceivable” that Biden’s Cancer Diagnosis Wasn’t Caught Sooner appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Starmer Binds Future Governments to EU Fishing ?Surrender? Deal to ?Reform-Proof? It Mon May 19, 2025 15:00 | Will Jones
Keir Starmer has effectively bound future governments to his?12-year fishing rights 'surrender' deal with Brussels in order to 'Reform proof' it after Farage's party topped the recent polls.
The post Starmer Binds Future Governments to EU Fishing ‘Surrender’ Deal to ‘Reform-Proof’ It appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Sheer, Bug-Eyed Insanity of Labour?s ?Banter Ban? Mon May 19, 2025 13:00 | Toby Young
Amidst all the problems facing the hospitality sector, Labour wants to add to them by forcing them to impose a ?banter ban?. We need to stop this madness before even more pubs are forced to close.
The post The Sheer, Bug-Eyed Insanity of Labour?s ?Banter Ban? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Case For Reducing Lucy Connolly?s 31-Month Sentence (For a Tweet) Mon May 19, 2025 11:00 | Laurie Wastell
Lucy Connolly has spent more than 280 days in prison for an intemperate tweet about the Southport murders which she deleted in less than four hours. Laurie Wastell sets out the case for setting her free.
The post The Case For Reducing Lucy Connolly?s 31-Month Sentence (For a Tweet) appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4ALL TRADE between EU states and Israel should cease immediately in view of the alleged war crimes committed in Gaza and the cover-up by the Israeli military. That should include dealing with Israeli companies registered in EU member states.
Terrorizing the civilian population in Gaza by the killing of non-combatants is a crime under international law.
The dropping of hundreds of thousands of illegal cluster bombs in southern Lebanon was a deliberate action to permanently contaminate the country, and was also a war crime. 90% of these bombs were dropped after the cease-fire agreed with the UN.
The world cannot continue to deal with a state that continues to act in this barbarous manner and then has the audacity to claim to be democratic.
If this is the case then Ireland should not trade with the us or Britain!!!
But in under law Ireland has to tender contracts and take the best price. If an isreali company has the best offer then the defence forces are obliged to take it!
Hi Mark, in fact there is no legal obligation to buy arms from Israel. I'm not surprised you think there is, because this is the line our government puts out. The department. of foreign affairs, whenever we or TDs have asked questions about their purchase of Israeli arms always use the fact that they are 'obliged to' use the EDA Code of Conduct on Defence Procurement, (and under this code there's no reason not to buy weapons from Israel).
However this is simply incorrect - the code is explicitly a "voluntary, non-binding agreement" which involves "no legal commitment", and states that "in all cases, the final authority for contract award remains with [member states'] national authorities". Furthermore, the Code is an agreement between EU member states, not including Israel, with the declared aim of maximizing opportunities for "suppliers based on each others' territories". On no interpretation can this agreement be presented as compelling Ireland to open its procurement competitions to any Israeli arms company. Companies excluded from the outset incur no costs in tendering, and thus have no legal cause of action.
What this boils down to is that our government is buying bullets from Israel because it wants to, not because it's legally obliged to.
While I dont disagree that they are a less than savoury bidder I do wonder if you would support spending more tax payers money to buy from the second cheapest bidder? (Presuming of course that the decision was based purely on cost, it may well have been based on the product itself for all I know)